Originally Posted by
cadetdrivr
^ ^ ^
Yup.
Due to UAL's contractual inability to do a system bid (or flush in this case) this displacement provides UAL many options depending upon expected demand. UAL can easily cancel displacements as required or run additional displacements targeting specific objectives.
All of that makes sense. However our “leadership” is leading through fear. Threatening furloughs and a massive displacement. AAL leadership has come out and said their goal is zero furloughs. They are taking a more positive approach. I get that the sky is falling but our leadership could at least fake an effort to not furlough a third of all UAL employees.