Originally Posted by
ERflyer
Three separate issues all with different backgrounds. I don’t see them tied together.
The Scheduling Chairman should not have been fired.
VB’s were a concession that could be pulled. Any concession that can be removed painlessly - should be.
SILs were pulled to prevent a FA union from gaining more traction.
I also consider not volunteering for a pay cut on the way to possible bankruptcy to be progress.
I agree that the SIL LOA pulldown was probably partially due to the perception that it may help a FA union effort.
I wouldn’t consider a negotiated agreement as ‘volunteering’, but that’s semantics.
I also don’t consider not getting anything done as ‘progress’, but again, semantics.