Originally Posted by
MoarAlpha
I work for another airline but my spouse works for United.
I have heard they won't let nonrevs occupy seats over a 70% load factor, but they will sell revenue to 100%. Is this correct? Seems like a real slash to such a tangible benefit.
Blame China, not United execs. First and foremost they are running a business and, unfortunately for those who want to nonrev, they want to keep enough space so that "social distancing" is possible, but also sell enough tickets in case there are people who don't care one way or the other. In other words, if they're going to have to re-accommodate paying pax, they'd rather do it because of other paying pax.
Under the circumstances, I'm OK with it. They're getting creative and they're positive spacing commuters.
Originally Posted by
ToddChavez
Wake up... this whole thing has never been about a virus or anyone's safety.
You're right. Let me guess, your theory includes the words "Roswell," "Activist Judges", "George Soros," and "Illuminati".