Originally Posted by
Itsajob
Paying more people part time wages with full time benefits isn’t what they’re after. They are going to slash expenditures to the bone everywhere they can. Employees are just a line on a balance sheet. If a furlough will create a smaller number for that line, that is what they’re going to do. I also suspect that most who have taken the various SRL options have done it because they don’t want to deal with reserve, the hassle of commuting on a reduced schedule, or dealing with flying and layovers while everything is locked down, not to help the company or to possibly reduce a furlough. I’d be surprised if very many elected to reduce their hours significantly once those barriers are removed. The bottom line is that they’re going to shrink the airline and there is nothing we can do to stop it. Personally, I’d love to stay out on a SRL until the loads are back, but I won’t be given that option. They are going to make their cuts, there will be lots of displacements, and many will hit the streets. It stinks.
That’s not what SK said today on a CNBC segment from this morning, nor is it what Todd said on the P2P call (you can listen to a recording of that call via the MEC website) earlier this week ... company is looking for unions to agree to less hours, not less pay rates; I’m fine with less hours, but not fine with it mandated via a change to the UPA ... voluntary yes, mandatory no ... we did this in 2008 at CAL and it worked ... needs appropriate guards rails of course ... and yes, my reps know my position ... pass Your’s on to your reps now because the company and the union are talking.