View Single Post
Old 06-11-2020 | 02:50 PM
  #10  
ZeroTT
Banned
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
If there is demand for frequency at small airports, then yes.
well that’s the big question. It’s not a matter if 6x 50 per day vs 2x 150. 4x 64 works pretty well. But scope! But scope! Yes the airport’s that had 4x 64 and 3 x 150 before now get 4x 150

Frequency is expensive. It’s worth the cost if you’re in an arms race. If two other carriers use frequency to steal your pax, you have to respond. If everyone pulls back to half their former selves, maybe everyone stops fighting over Evansville and Tri Cities
Reply