Originally Posted by
Tom Bradys Cat
Prima facie you may be correct. But lets discect your logic because what you have written in one sentence sums up the ENTIRE lockdown argument.
110000 because we got R down. Correct, thats just maths. But you went on to draw a baseless conclusion and herein lies the problem. There is scant evidence that your theory is correct, its still a hypothesis.
Make hypothesis, prove it, then make a statement (theory) (as yours is above). You are at stage one....make hypothesis. Society is at stage one. Politicians are happy to be at stage one.
You may be correct, but that is by luck and wishful thinking. A more realistic hypothesis would have ended...'in part to shutting down, to what degree is very much unknown'.
Im sorry for picking on you but it is these ill considered, binary soundbites that have lead us by the nose into this ridiculus situation. We may not feel responsible for this mess but we can certainly be more careful with our words.
This sounds suspiciously like science. Because I identify as a lockdown denier: