Originally Posted by
AAL24
Because the president assigned a law firm with management side experience to act as counsel and advisor to the negotiating committee. The APA president reaffirmed that concessions will not be considered. He thinks having a firm with experience working for the other side could benefit APA in negotiations. The negotiating committee didn’t like it and resigned.
Did our (now resigned) NC, have the smartest man in the room complex?
I will give the NC their due and say the LOA letter 20-001 was very good.
While letter 20-002 was mediocre to terrible and lacking the required language. (More APAs style)
Make me wonder if the NC actually negotiated 20-001 or was it rather a company proposal.