Originally Posted by
rvr1800
Here’s my conspiracy theory. I don’t think this is a merger scenario. I believe it’s going to involve parking the 190’s and possibly receiving deliveries of more 220’s. Those are big money items that can affect stock prices of multiple companies. An NDA would be appropriate.
It's possible you are correct. With Neeleman delaying Breezes start-up there could be some additional early delivery A220 slots available.
But... But... The words "parking the E190" or "accelerating A220 deliveries" would not likely be anywhere in an ALPA-JB LOA regarding no-furlough or credit caps etc.
Even if the LOA made minor changes to displacement language or otherwise, again, the specifics of fleet decisions would never need to be mentioned in that LOA.
I don't see fleet decisions being the reason for an NDA for this specific LOA.
My opinion of course.