Originally Posted by
DWC CAP10 USAF
Well if you guys are being told what's contained in the negotiators notes regarding this LOA, that's news to me because our own MEC hasn't shared that info with us.
I don’t know what to tel you about that, call your rep maybe? But that information posted was given fact from DAL Mgmt to your MEC and then mine.
Originally Posted by
DWC CAP10 USAF
As for intenet, I'm only a public school grad, but if the intent was for it to only apply to Compass, then wouldn't it be written as "only Compass" and not "affiliate referenced in such LOAs or at another carrier"? Seems the words shows their intent....probably more so than other areas of the PWA that contains copious amounts of legal jargon.
This again speaks to DAL Mgmt. as a whole. How compliant are they on top end scope? If they won’t honor top end scope, why should they honor bottom end? Especially when their attitude is “it’s no longer valid”.