At this time there is no evidence of latency. Yes a decade later this could be proven different. But, with this genome, it's just not predicted. None of the colleagues I work with are tuned to this. We are all in agreement of reinfection vs relapse at the moment.

Dr. Muhammad Yousuf highlights the summary below.

Current clinical evidence is highly in the two articles. Note in the first article (1) that HCWs who had clinical recovery did not transmit the disease to contacts despite positive RT-PCR tests.

Study (2), patients who had clinically recovered but showed positive RNA based RT-PCR tests did not transmit COVID-19 by donating plasma that was transfused to other recipients.
This indicates that SARS-CoV-2 virus latency or reactivation is more of a hype than a reality and viral RNA in clinically recovered patient is inactive viral litter or garbage, not an active virus.
1.
Article https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339890462_Post-discharge_surveillance_and_positive_virus_detectio n_in_two_medical_staff_recovered_from_coronavirus_ disease_2019_COVID-19_China_January_to_February_2020
2.
Article https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341583584_Coronavirus_Disease_2019_Test_Results_Af ter_Clinical_Recovery_and_Hospital_Discharge_Among _Patients_in_China