Originally Posted by
dera
BS line, really? You are clueless man.
You can not file a grievance over a "status quo" violation over something that has a) never been status quo and b) that is not in the scope of the contract. You need to read some RLA before you spew that garbage in here.
The company allowing an unauthorized app to sneak in DECS is not, and never was, status quo, nor is or can it be protected by the RLA. This is not a contractual dispute, this is AAG data security. An arbitrator would laugh at this grievance. That would be $20k of your dues money well spent. Not.
Originally Posted by
UncreativeUser
100% agree. Also, the guys in the school house always told me to learn the Sabre guide, not to rely on QT.
QT was a conduit between the user and Sabre, a system that they never truly had access to. Which means, while AAG pays for each employee to have their login info, QT piggybacks those credentials and was making money off of AAG. That’s how they’re going to view it, regardless if it had great intentions for the pilot group. It was never official.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think you miss what defines the term status quo in this context. Even things outside the contract can become status quo, which is the reason the company wants pilots to grieve things the company does that violates that contract, so it doesn’t become the status quo