Originally Posted by
Huell
If pOTUS had provided effective LEADERSHIP it would have provided a consistent policy nationwide. Maybe not a perfect policy but one that would have been more effective and open to input.
There will always be some that dislike anything from a Republican just as some (maybe you for example) will dislike anything from a Dem.
I honestly believe that any of the other candidates would have been better choices and capable of providing effective
LEADERSHIP ... not referring to just Hillary... any of the other GOP primary candidates as well. However, choices were made and we have what we have. Our pOTUS won fair and square even though he was totally unqualified ... as he has demonstrated consistently.
All of us have the right to complain. Even those that voted for the problem.
With proper measures not taken ... and actually discouraged by pOTUS ... things are getting worse ... which was predictable ... let's hope ridership doesn't drop off again.
After this post I may not see you for awhile ... or maybe under this screen name. Hoping for the best.
While the president has a tactless approach with some blemishes on his record, I’m not exactly sure what more you expect him to do? Centralized decision making, or federalism, is not the way we are set up. This country is wide and diverse and unlike the beltway. Treating it like so seems negligent.
When he shut down travel he was called a xenophobic. What did madame Pelosi do? Go around Chinatown hugging pedestrians calling Trump reckless. Whether you like the man or not it’s undeniable the media’s subversion of his policies. They have been fueling this hysterical fire regarding the virus.
Where he’s miss stepped is with Fauci and Brix. Fauci failed with the AIDS epidemic in the 80’s and he’s failed again. He’s doubled down on a vaccine. Vaccines have been mostly ineffective against RNA based viruses. But then to float the idea a vaccine passport is ludicrous and totalitarian. Brix has admitted repeatedly that people who have been admitted, tested positive (alive or posthumously) have been tallied as Covid deaths regardless of the cause. Therefore, inflating the numbers and adding to the media hype. The models they relied on where incredibly inaccurate, which set the pandemonium in motion.
What we do know is:
if your under the age of 70, the death rate is 0.04%.
Masks, whether they stop the spread or not, most face coverings have pore sizes of 100-200 microns and the wuhan virus measures 0.1 microns.
The youth were the ones out “protesting”.The spike in cases as been amongst the young and in bars. But there seems to be no correlation🤔.
As to your last comments, I’ve never had an alter ego. Don’t need to. You?
Frats