Originally Posted by
J1180
There are two separate things going on.
1. warn letters as result of The government Warn act. Basically if a large company is expecting mass layoffs they must give at least 60 days notice. This is something they suspect could happen and it’s required by law they give this notice. So it’s often a good idea to send a few extra since things could get worse.
2. Contractually you’ll have a minimum timeframe the company has to tell you about A furlough. This is your real hard you’re going to be furloughed notice.
In either case the company can always furlough less on oct 1. They can’t furlough more without sending more notices.
Clear as mud?
yes I understand that, but what I’m saying is that this second letter that some are getting makes it sound like your #2 scenario is already happening. A positive furlough by way of the second letter. But there is no bid or communique about the number.
Or, ExpressJet sent out the wrong attachment. The letter-to-come sent out early. I still don’t get it.