Originally Posted by
sanicom3205
*sigh*
Literally, here’s the rest of that paragraph you cherry picked:
”“So we are at IDPH trying to remove those obvious cases where the COVID diagnosis was not the reason for the death. If there was a gunshot wound, if there was a motor vehicle accident, we know that that was not related to the COVID positive status.
“We are trying to make sure that things that aren’t related at all to the COVID diagnosis are removed, but if someone has another illness, like heart disease, and then had a stroke or other event, it’s not as easy to separate that and say COVID didn’t exacerbate that existing illness. That would not be removed from the count,” she added.
See how the narrative changes when you include the whole story?? I bet you chirp at the media for that, don’t ya?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/newscha...cause-of-death
Took me three seconds to find this. It was the third article that came up in the search engine when I searched “IDPH adjusted Covid deaths”. If you want to verify and then go after states for not doing the right thing, I’m all for it. More accurate data is better for all of us. But what you’re doing now is far from that.
Lol. I’ve already seen that article. Nowhere does it say they have actually already fixed the numbers. It just says they need to. So show me actual data. Show me where they adjusted to 10,000 to 7,500 or whatever. And again, even if they did, how many other states haven’t. I have more of a chance of getting a Ferrari from Santa Claus this Halloween than for the 136k death numbers to be anywhere close to accurate.
Even Dr. Birx says it’s inflated by 25%. Are you saying she’s wrong?