View Single Post
Old 01-29-2008, 07:11 AM
  #1047  
Bucking Bar
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,990
Default

The 88 just needs a three volume cross reference for cold weather operations, EEC's, FADEC, modern avionics, servos, GPS, a Flight Engineer, better brakes, effective hydraulic system, new engines and a new wing. Other than that, it's almost a Boeing. I'm surprised there isn't a 10 page MDXX thread somewhere.

The AirTran guys tell me the MD95/717 fixed a lot of the Mad Dog's quirks and it flies like the DC9-30.

All that having been said, I like the 88. It is comfortable, quiet and keeps you involved. It is a work horse and surprisingly efficient for a jet with a Type Certificate issuance date of 1962. Figure most of the design work and cockpit layout was set up a half century ago.
Bucking Bar is offline