What exactly is it that I refuse to acknowledge? Perhaps reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, but back in April I said that even the projected number of deaths didn't justify a lockdown in my opinion. If the projected number of deaths was 150k, then that would justify some reasonable actions (which I support). I've feel that I've been pretty clear that reasonable people can disagree on the subjective morality of tolerable deaths, although obviously that's not something you believe.