Originally Posted by
PontiusPilot
“Stats?” Let’s see. No scientific study. No peer review.
Yet somehow, you think the burden is on us to prove this quack is wrong.
This is why conspiracy theories thrive, and why political astroturfing is a thing.
#cultureofignorance
You don’t need a study. A study is to prove a hypothesis wrong. I am saying surely someone out there could easily prove her STATEMENT is wrong. No study needed.
40+ news organizations jumped down her throat, and all of them bash her crazy talk, and say FDA proved HQC debunked. Not one says that statement was wrong.