Originally Posted by
Flyinguy
You don’t need a study. A study is to prove a hypothesis wrong. I am saying surely someone out there could easily prove her STATEMENT is wrong. No study needed.
40+ news organizations jumped down her throat, and all of them bash her crazy talk, and say FDA proved HQC debunked. Not one says that statement was wrong.
So let me get this straight. You want the media and the public to fact check a doctor (and preacher) who has made repeated ridiculous and legitimately crazy comments about health in the past. You feel that the onus is on the media to prove her wrong, and not that she should prove her statements true?
As to why no one researches the validity of her statements, it would be a long and laborious process to track down each of her patients and get them to reveal their medical histories. And do all this to disprove an
already proven crazy person.
To put it simply:
