Originally Posted by
biigD
Someone help me out here - as I read it, anyone that's furloughed with a ZTL guy junior to them would have had to *choose* to be furloughed, correct? If that's the case, I don't see the problem. Maybe I'm missing something.
Nope, you got it right. A lot of mouth breathing on this one right now on the web boards, guys are on edge so I can’t blame them. You got something extra that wasn’t in the contract. If you don’t like it you lose exactly nothing.