Originally Posted by
terks43
Thats easy, steady Taxpayer funded income with a pension for life and the security of knowing no matter how poorly a job you do as a regulator that nobody is ever going to replace you. (Last bit is in relation to the entire FAA and no just a single inspector)
I see. So an income that is less than what can be found in industry, and a pension that, again, will be usually less than found in industry (speaking of operations/airline) somehow offends you. Got it.
In every segment there are people that are poor performers. Even in your industry there are those that are subpar at best. Then, as in your industry, even in government there are those that strive to do the best job possible. And in government doing that job is often difficult considering the layers of bureaucracy, the whims of politicians and the pressure of industry.
Originally Posted by
terks43
The FAA doesn’t have to preform well to justify its existence and further funding, it just merely has to exist to get that.
Yea, right.
Of course you have absolutely no clue as to the inner workings of the agency, I understand that.
You aren't there when the budgets are submitted, or when congress mandates through law changes, but then refuses to fund the agency for those changes. Nor do you see the budget cuts that do take place.
Yea, I can see how you call those "perks"............
