Originally Posted by
NeverHome
There is a lot of merit to the GFS and being able to see how the system responds to inputs. However, I like the paper because IMO it forces you to use your imagination. You have to visualize what’s happening. I think that plants the knowledge deeper. I feel like GFS is superficial, but with paper you have to work harder and therefore it sticks better. Just my opinion from having done both GFS (145) and paper (DHC8)
Agreed. I prefer the paper tiger as well, especially when practicing with partners. If there’s a disagreement or misunderstanding, then it forced us to look it up.
The GFS has its merit in many things as well. I just prefer the PT