So many simple questions you will not and cannot answer. Look at my last few posts I have asked probably 20 important questions. The published papers and videos do not answer them either. Another day with no companies to compare this to. No answers to what happens if the stabilization fund runs dry and the company does not have to contribute more to the fund because of the codification of the plan. No answers to the level of PBGC assumption of our pension in the event of a termination. But plenty of jokes in response to real questions.

you are willing to subject our retirement to an experiment that has a high Probability of failure. I was hoping the 25+% stock market correction in the spring would save us from the folly of a variable plan overly reliant on the stock market. It did for a bit, but easy money out of thin air has resurrected the market and this VB plan with a savings account on the side just won’t die.

please answer at least one of the questions posed in the previous pages and we can move the ball forward. Many of them are in bold so they should be easy to find. Otherwise your lack of answers will probably keep growing the numbers in favor of improving our current fund vice conducting an experiment on the economic livelihood and lifestyles of the remaining 25 years of our surviving spouses in retirement. That is who this will affect the most so we want answers and if you understand this plan as much as you say then you should provide them or show us where they are instead of telling us that it was covered somewhere. Just read the literature or duh is not sufficient to pacify our risk assessments. Dr K