Originally Posted by
crflyer
Man, I feel for you every time you try to explain this.
It’s probably as fruitless as people listing every time in the past that snap back clauses, furlough protections, saving the pension, or any other concessions have failed. I don’t know if people can’t learn from history, or if they fall into the trap because this time it affects them. This should be interesting to watch once we find out what is actually in the agreement. I’ll get one vote and live with the decision. I just hope that people use math and sound reason rather than emotion when reviewing this thing. Prior to COVID we were potentially getting closer to having a contract that would have actual gains, rather than attempting to claw back from the last time we played this game. My guess is that we end up kicking the can down the road and spend the next decade trying to get back what we already have........again.