Originally Posted by
130shadow
And as Mako says, you chose to slog it out. I don’t begrudge you for making that choice. I am AGAINST someone being paid CA pay while they sit FO because they got bumped and can NO longer hold they seat. If that happens, they are throwing seniority out the window. Why is that so hard to understand? It’s a carve out for a yes vote. It shouldn’t matter if it saves furloughs or not, that’s not the point. It may be the outcome, but not the point I am trying to make.
And I'm sure you were at the forefront of fight LOA 25 "carve out" for the UAL furloughee's. Oh wait, that didn't affect you so it was OK,.