Originally Posted by
130shadow
And as Mako says, you chose to slog it out. I don’t begrudge you for making that choice. I am AGAINST someone being paid CA pay while they sit FO because they got bumped and can NO longer hold they seat. If that happens, they are throwing seniority out the window. Why is that so hard to understand? It’s a carve out for a yes vote. It shouldn’t matter if it saves furloughs or not, that’s not the point. It may be the outcome, but not the point I am trying to make.
Since we don't know what the AIP/TA really says, we're just speculating, but it is my understanding from reading what others have said on this thread that the middle third will have their displacements cancelled. That, to me, means that they will no longer be NB FOs, but will go back to holding their NB CA seats (on Reserve). So, I'm not sure where you're coming from when you say they'll get CA pay while sitting FO.