Originally Posted by
SystemB
Just wondering.. IF the middle third were supposedly to not be furloughed, then what justifies the deeper MPG cut compared to the top third? Aside from “gotta pay your dues”...
The carrot is the cancellation of the displacement, so despite the MPG reduction, those displaced to a lower paying fleet or seat would make up the lower MPG at the higher rate. The only justification is that they’d be willing to accept it.