Originally Posted by
Denny Crane
There was no one reason. It was a combination of factors two of which you mention.
You are correct about the no metric for the VEOP. There should have been. Are you saying I shouldn’t have taken it because of no metric?
The big difference here is the memrat of LOA 20-03 and not of the VEOP let alone the company is only required to keep the 220 for an extra month. The 600 from the VEOP currently have no such restrictions.
Denny
Edit: Thinking about it, there should have been a metic tied to the VEOP. Problem is we didn’t get to vote on it like we do now.
No my point was simply that the lack of metrics wasn't a factor in your decision. I understand what your saying about the 220 and Jan 1st. However, the company can furlough the 600 whenever they want there was never such a requirement to keep any saved from the VEOP.