Originally Posted by
germanaviator
Representative democracy, also known as
indirect democracy or
representative government, is a
type of democracy founded on the principle of elected officials representing a group of people, as opposed to
direct democracy.
[1] Nearly all modern
Western-style democracies are types of representative democracies; for example, the
United Kingdom is a
unitary parliamentary constitutional monarchy,
France is a
unitary semi-presidential republic, and the
United States is a
federal presidential republic.
[2]
It is an element of both the
parliamentary and the
presidential systems of
government and is typically used in a
lower chamber such as the
House of Commons of the United Kingdom, or
Lok Sabha of
India, and may be curtailed by constitutional constraints such as an
upper chamber. It has been described by some political theorists including
Robert A. Dahl, Gregory Houston and Ian Liebenberg as
polyarchy.
[3][4] In it the power is in the hands of the representatives who are elected by the people. Political parties are often central to this form of democracy because electoral systems require voters to vote for political parties as opposed to individual representatives.
[5]
Representative democracy, also known as indirect democracy or representative government, is a type of democracy founded on the principle of elected officials representing a group of people, as opposed to direct democracy.[1] Nearly all modern Western-style democracies are types of representative democracies; for example, the United Kingdom is a unitary parliamentary constitutional monarchy, France is a unitary semi-presidential republic, and the United States is a federal presidential republic.[2] It is an element of both the parliamentary and the presidential systems of government and is typically used in a lower chamber such as the House of Commons of the United Kingdom, or Lok Sabha of India, and may be curtailed by constitutional constraints such as an upper chamber. It has been described by some political theorists including Robert A. Dahl, Gregory Houston and Ian Liebenberg as polyarchy.[3][4] In it the power is in the hands of the representatives who are elected by the people. Political parties are often central to this form of democracy because electoral systems require voters to vote for political parties as opposed to individual representatives.[5]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representative_democracy
Of course Wikipedia cannot be wrong, and supposedly a monarchy can also be a democracy. Leaving all that double think aside for the moment, I guess then you were mistaken in saying the US elections were undemocratic. According to your own copy and paste, it would be very democratic.
Or do you still think the Presidential election is undemocratic, even though you “proved” it democratic? Further, in the US, the President can veto a law created by a majority vote in both the House and Senate, seems a bit undemocratic or do you believe that is democratic?
Why would we call a form of government that is clearly not a democracy, democratic?