Originally Posted by
biigD
The .5% assessment to help furloughs with medical bennies barely passed. ALPA might be an improvement, but you’re kidding yourself if you think Delta or *especially* United’s deal would have been acceptable to this pilot group.
Whether it would or wouldnt have is not the question. It was not subject to member ratification. It wasnt even truly surveyed, and then after the fact EF says oh, yeah, let's survey the people left on property about how good a job APA did? The BoD is not nearly accountable enough to the membership as a whole and hides behind closed door meetings so they cant be. Band the BoD to different segments of the senority list and you would have a more accurate representation of the memberships desires at the table. Make their proposals fully visible to the membership before they vote on them. Make the board minutes accessible to the membership show we truly know what was said, what direction was given, and what truly happened. Else they should be assessed on the results of what they delivered, land compare to their peers, they failed to deliver.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk