Originally Posted by
JohnnyBekkestad
i agree, however my understanding is that UALPA would never let the new company get that workforce for “cheaper” and when you have a company that has a very top heavy workforce it becomes a problem... now that asset becomes a burden and they elected to dissolve and also that rumor with breeze died out supposedly due to this...
When it comes to flying that is contracted out, UALPA only defines and enforces scope. They have no say in who does what, that is 100% United’s decision.