Originally Posted by
NE_Pilot
That’s not what the Wikipedia article says, but it is funny that you consider Wikipedia a “reliable source”. It says the articles are not yet peer reviewed, but peer review has no bearing on whether something is true or not, or whether the “science” is accurate.
Sigh...
https://yoda.yale.edu/medrxiv
Please note: although documents are screened prior to posting, medRxiv preprints are not formally peer reviewed and any content or results should not be used for clinical medicine.
What’s even funnier, is right in Mesabah’s own link is the following header:
Withdrawal The authors have withdrawn this manuscript because there are increased rates of SARS- CoV-2 cases in the areas that we originally analyzed in this study.