Originally Posted by
Finessed
Also scope clause is a factor and legit argument for the 200 to stay, but it’s probably being renegotiated as we speak. United could decide that protecting a slot with a little 200 on an unprofitable route makes long term sense, OR they could let routes go like they have in the past. They could also go for reduced frequency on larger aircraft, which reduces the demand for slots. I personally believe the future of 200 is dictated on protecting or not protecting slots, not scope.
Or UA turns it over to “at risk” and few small operations take on that risk and fly 200’s around for another 5-10 years.. (if they can make money doing it)