Originally Posted by
Guppydriver95
I’ve done both, and IMO the variable that is so difficult to quantify if the toll that a steady diet of WB flying takes on one’s body. Constant circadian rhythm disruptions aren’t healthy. I think how well one can rest in a bunk, adapt on a layover, and get reaclimated are factors involved in choosing the type of flying one does. Throw in long layovers where it can be easy to overeat and drink if you’re not careful, and it’s a recipe for poor health. I envy guys who can do it without feeling whipped at the end of a trip half way around the world.
I’m one of those people who actually feel better flying WB, but I don’t act like most WB pilots. I sleep like a rock in the bunk, and I’m not much fun on a layover. I take a good nap when I get to the hotel, get some exercise, have a healthy meal, don’t drink alcohol, and then back to sleep. On go home day, I have a nice breakfast, sleep well in the bunk, and get home that night. I’m usually pretty tired, but I just go to bed, get a good night sleep, and feel fine the next day. Domestic is harder for me. Irregular hours, short layovers, delays, weather, extra workload, and still commute. The best thing that I’ve found for my health is the last 8 months of staying home. Eventually going back to work is going to be an adjustment.