Originally Posted by
3rdtimesacharm
If a victim of 9/11 can sue American Airlines for being hinacked, why shouldn't a victim of gun violence be able to sue the manufacturer of a gun designed to kill?
Because the airlines were responsible for the security provisions at the gates.
A gun manufacturer has absolutely no way to impact the security of a gun or its use. That liability should end with the owner. Mine are in a safe and only fire when I want them to.