Originally Posted by
acecrackshot
So? Its a legal product. Killing isn't always unlawful. I mean, if the whole goal is disarm people in the face of their Constitutional rights, why not just be honest about it, rather than retreating behind poor thought out semantics?
I guess we need to pull them off of all the police officers, then. We can give them Stun Sticks and harsh language.
If you want to kill industries via massive liability costs, I guess we can see General Aviation as a prime victim of that.
Certainly made lots of PI attorneys wealthy, though. Won't someone think of the poor PI attorneys!
You absolutely assumed the opposite of my intent. You can sue someone - ie an airline - for killing someone when their promise is safety. A gun is by design a killing machine. I said nothing about legality or worth or right vs wrong. Only that it’s silly to sue over something that functioned correctly as opposed to the airplane which didn’t.