Originally Posted by
tennisguru
I agree that the intent was that the one year PLOA was guaranteed if the pilot wanted it. Hopefully the company will abide by that, especially given how the safe money bet last fall was that the company wouldn't have even hit the bottom of the list to begin inverse assignments until this coming fall at the earliest...
This would be a huge ball drop by ALPA if their negotiators notepad said something so explicitly wrong. It was clearly stated that up to a one year LOA is guaranteed. And the company should absolutely abide by the intent—it’s very logical that some people made commitments due to industry uncertainty, and they shouldn’t be forced to choose now.