That lack of pharmaceutical company liability is true for all vaccines. It has been for decades now. Regardless, this "vaccine" is different in that it's not really a vaccine in the traditional sense. Don't go by how Merriam-Webster defines the word though, they quietly changed their definition last month to incorporate these new "vaccines."

As has been said, you can get the covid "vaccine" and still get infected by and pass on covid to others. How are you immunized if that is not only possible, but likely? Show me someone getting and giving measles or polio after having been vaccinated for those diseases.

I get that there is more than just living or dying though. I know people with long/longer term covid effects. Even if your chances of dying as a healthy individual under 70 are very minimal, there are those that suffer from lung damage, etc. No one wants to be included in those statistics. But if there are therapeutic treatments that are effective, wouldn't you like to know your options and be able to make an informed decision with your doctor? Unfortunately it has all been politicised for whatever reasons. Who knows what the truth is?

I do know that I don't want to be a Guinea Pig without more information and actual non-biased studies and statistics on the efficacy of the "vaccines" AND the various therapeutic treatments. Whether that drug company is getting billions for jabbing the population with a new type of vaccine or only 50 cents for the horse or malaria pill, I think we should individually decide how we treat. And that doesn't mean we get relegated to second class citizens without the ability to travel etc. for having made that decision. I'm trying to see the perspective of the "you must vaccinate" crowd. I think it would be wise for them to look a little deeper into the other sides perspective also.