Originally Posted by
CA1900
I agree with the rest of your post, but the RLA is stacked against labor. That's by the design. It was specifically written to neuter our ability to strike, and that lessens our leverage. It's definitely not impossible to make great gains, but it's more difficult and more time-consuming than operating under the NLRA would be.
It’s not stacked against labor. It
is designed to draw out the negotiating process to minimize the chances of an interruption of commerce. In that sense, it’s tilted
toward the flying public. If it’s tilted against either side, it’s tilted against the less patient and less informed side. That side is usually labor in the airline industry. So, in that way, yes it’s tilted against labor. But it’s not the RLA that does the tilting, it’s labor itself that tilts the RLA against labor.
The RLA doesn’t neuter our ability to strike. How does it do that? There’s only one body within the United States that can prevent labor from striking and if it does so, it occurs completely outside the bounds of the RLA and after the RLA has completely exhausted itself. It has never used that power to avert an airline strike. It’s a rare occurrence and has only happened so far within the confines of the railroad industry.
Here’s a good
primer on the RLA, written by a NMB mediator.