Originally Posted by
fishforfun
According to PB it’s not compass specific. Here are the words he used and there is an important distinction in his choice of words. Here is what he said “Exception Two of the PWA requires that either (1) the hiring and flow provisions of LOA #9 must exist at Compass or another carrier...” The use of the term another carrier is concern that they feel they have the option to find another carrier on their own to fulfill the LOA.
i think the union’s counter argument will revolve around section 1. e. ......
In such event (partial or complete divestiture of Compass) Delta, Compass, and the Association will meet and confer for the purpose of discussing whether continuation or modification of this LOA would be appropriate given the circumstances at that time. Any continuation or modification will require the agreement of Delta, Compass, and the Association.
it’s seems to me obvious that the company cannot simply substitute EndeavorAir for Compass without our consent. I also think this would need to go to the membership for a vote.
I think we all need to realize that we just gained back bottom end scope. Giving that up is not a very palatable option and will cost a lot. Let’s get a list going for what is the price are we willing to sell 35RJs of scope.
Mine starts with
1) much improved international scope
and
2) profit sharing formula back to 2012 formula or better