Originally Posted by
Regularguy
You are really confused, can't seem to read with comprehension, make unfounded assumptions and more.
Just throw out the tired, worn and invalid "what about-ism" defense when your position is not only un-defendable it is purely repulsive and an affront to the Citizens the USA. The very use of this argument demonstrates you have nothing more than a sophomoric view of politics and legal matters.
And by the way, it appears unlike you, I support the legal and truly peaceful right of free speech and protest in these United States. I do not, as any sane person shouldn't, support any violence, personal bodily attacks, destruction of property or actions against our Governmental processes, and that includes the breaking into and the destruction of our Capital building and what it represents.
You, as well as many others (no political Party excluded) need to be consistent in your values and stop demonstrating ingenuous and immature opinions of these events.
“Yes, Grasshopper. But can any man afford such arrogance?”
My “position” is being against the attempted violent overthrow of the government and against legitimizing, making excuses for, supporting, or deemphasizing, or lying to protect domestic terrorism (which you unequivocally just did with your “mostly peaceful, no deaths endorsement).
I never brought up Pelosi, BLM, AOC, or whatever else you are raving about. You threw that out there in a panicked deflection after getting called out for saying that You don’t think Jan 6 was so bad.