Originally Posted by
Vsop
i think the union’s counter argument will revolve around section 1. e. ......In such event (partial or complete divestiture of Compass) Delta, Compass, and the Association will meet and confer for the purpose of discussing whether continuation or modification of this LOA would be appropriate given the circumstances at that time. Any continuation or modification will require the agreement of Delta, Compass, and the Association.
it’s seems to me obvious that the company cannot simply substitute EndeavorAir for Compass without our consent. I also think this would need to go to the membership for a vote.
I think we all need to realize that we just gained back bottom end scope. Giving that up is not a very palatable option and will cost a lot. Let’s get a list going for what is the price are we willing to sell 35RJs of scope.
Mine starts with
1) much improved international scope
and
2) profit sharing formula back to 2012 formula or better
Possible they claim that section was satisfied when Compass was divested and sold to Trans State Holdings. If the party’s did meet and discussed anything then the notes would be relevant. DAL would argue notes and/or language isn’t being violated and has been fulfilled.
Seems unlikely an arbitrator would allow DAPLA to walk back any comments or notes made when Compass was sold just to add equity to their current Section6 negotiations.