Originally Posted by
Trip7
Those 35 fairly new CRJ900s are already delivered and paid for. Folding our arms and telling Delta you're not getting them back or bring them to mainline is unrealistic and a recipe for failure. I can see the arbitrator awarding financial penalties to DALPA but I doubt they would force the company to park the RJs because the company was actually trying to follow the intent of the flowback LOA/MOU. 350 debacle 2.0.
We do have leverage and if used appropriately we can get alot of contractual improvements.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
How are they trying to meet the intent? They have to come for a new agreement with us, they are not doing that. I know that they follow the contract when it is convent, but with the end of compass this LOA is not worth the paper it is written on.
I want Delta to make the most money it can, and flying those RJs will help. But just arbitrarily taking a stance on an loa that has been invalid for almost a year is a very weird flex.