Originally Posted by
Bornflying
You might be right, but Delta doesn't need a strong case...it just needs any case, since the burden is on DALPA. DALPA must prove that it was unreasonable to interpret the contract in any other way given the circumstances and that Delta was at fault for doing so (I.e, it was not beyond their financial or operational control).
That said, I'm not for the give in scope...but I certainly do want contractual progression to Delta.
Amazing how desperate some of you are for flow, JFC.
So let me guess, you want DALPA to give in to scope relief and negotiate something in return, which then allows for 35 RJ’s to fly permanently? Which of course, would allow you to flow, permanently.
You most certainly are for give in scope as long as it generates contractual progression for you.
It’s not very difficult to read through the incentives of a 9E poster on a DL thread.