View Single Post
Old 05-27-2021 | 04:58 PM
  #935  
notEnuf's Avatar
notEnuf
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,239
Likes: 687
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by PT6flyer
I would like to point out that under the scope section there is a relief that allows for "another carrier," So pointing this is a 4 part deal really is not correct. Delta wants LOA # 9 to live, so they took "another carrier", and made the pilot group whole again.
Once Compass was closed that provision ceased to be available triggering the reduction. This is not in dispute. Delta even tried to argue the reduction could be in block hours and not actual airframes. We are still waiting on arbitration on that claim. The company said they were in compliance because of the compass closure and the RJs were removed when in fact they weren't. They then claimed flight time was removed. Either way they intended to comply with the 35 jet reduction evidenced by their memo stating they were in compliance. Once removed, there is no mechanism for a new agreement other than a 4 party LOA for whatever terms we negotiate. LOA 9 was proof itself of the need to renegotiate because it was the mechanism to continue the flow for 35 jets after Trans States purchased Compass. Trans States would not have made the purchase if the jets and flying were subject to cancelation. One could argue it was a 5 party deal. Management could have done that again when LOA 9 died but it would be a new agreement with new parties. There is no provision for unilateral substitution after the fact without agreement.
Reply