Thread: UAL Vaccination
View Single Post
Old 06-12-2021 | 07:01 PM
  #140  
hummingbear's Avatar
hummingbear
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
DAL guy here... I hope it is OK that I crash this particular party as we have similar ongoing discussions going on and it is nice to get other perspectives. So... How do you know that you won't have an adverse reaction to the vaccines if you HAVE had ChinaFlu? If that is a non factor, why did the drug companies get complete liability waivers for them? What about other 'maladies' that have not been considered and if adverse reactions occur? For example what if you had A-fib before... AND had ChinaFlu? How do you know that the vaccines would not cause a bad reaction for you? What if you have asthma? or sleep apnea? or any of a myriad other 'normal' afflictions that are not life threatening but are unknown in terms of interaction with an experimental treatment?

You are correct. They don't have scientific answers.
First off, if you’re really just looking for a respectful discussion that yields refreshing perspectives, may I suggest dropping the “China Flu” nonsense. It’s a term that’s promoted specifically to make the discussion heated & emotional rather than data-based & rational.

Like I said, vaccinating the recovered is not my biggest concern by a long shot. I suspect- and research is continuing to suggest- that it may be moot in many circumstances. (Then again, only 1 in 10 Americans have had a confirmed case of COVID-19, so the issue isn’t as applicable as some are making it seem.) I’m only saying that if you think people should be making free, informed decisions- as it seems we both do- you need to be honest about the unknowns on both sides of the equation. Stating all the unknowns about duration of immunity, long-term complications, etc., of the vaccine without consenting the same of the virus itself is intellectually disingenuous.

Now the knowns. Nearly a billion people worldwide (including many with asthma, apnea, etc.) have received at least one dose with a death rate of essentially zero vs nearly 4 million dead from the virus- not to mention hospitalizations, lung-scarring, and other complications for many more. I don’t think most of us here need to live in fear of either, but I really question the logic of someone who is more afraid of the one that’s been proven safe in multiple clinical trials than the one that has killed 600K Americans alone and continues to spread rapidly & mutate in certain regions of the world.

It’s like refusing to wear a seatbelt because you think there are cancer causing agents in the material it’s made of. The car accident- even if statistically rare- is far more likely to kill you.