Originally Posted by
sailingfun
I am not sure where you get that data. The 787-900 has a 244,000 lb empty weight and typically seats 250 to 260 in a 4 class. UAL seats 257 in their 4 class. The A330-900 has a 302,000 lb empty weight and we seat 281 in a 4 class. Takeoff weights are close which is why the 787 has much better range/payload numbers and has crushed the A330-900 in sales.
In addition the 787 is a customer favorite with large windows, low cabin altitude, humidification and pure cabin air not pulled out of the compressor of the engine. It’s high, hot and short runway performance is also better.
What source did you use for the 330 empty weight? My quick google search says 119,600kg which is 244,000lb.
Delta chose to not get the humidifiers, and the cabin altitudes are likely similar in the 5000’ range.
Not in response to you, but general discussion:
I’m no Airbus fanboy, but just look at the 787 cockpit vs any Airbus. It’s cobbled together crap. Fleet simplification must also count for something; can’t imagine us introducing a new fleet type so quickly after ditching the 777 supposedly for fleet simplification.
Ultimately, I’ll fly what they buy.