Originally Posted by
sailingfun
It is a arbitration over one aspect of scope. I suspect he is talking about all of section 1.
He's referencing the 35 RJ issue in the 35 RJ thread, while asking about the arbitration for the 35 RJ issue in the 35 RJ thread. I understand trying to give the benefit of the doubt, but the readers can only read what he said, not what he meant. I also think you are incorrectly assuming he had a wider point.