Originally Posted by
GolferNJ
Fantastic! From your own link, “medRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information”.
You will be more sad for us when you hear that the ALPA message I received today confirms that this is an HR problem, not a union problem.
Thanks! If you continue reading you will find that this study states "
This work was supported by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention contracts 75D30120C09870 and 75D30121C11060 to D.H.O and T.C.F.".
As you can imagine, conducting peer reviews takes time. Then again, they didn't wait to properly trial the vaccine which you apparently jumped all over. Therefore you should accept this article.