Originally Posted by
fcoolaiddrinker
Hospitalization rates for infection are around 5.5% where I live. If I can save 1 million per 100 people infected as an insurance company I’m putting pressure on clients to mandate vaccination. Even if those cost numbers are off a bit I’m asking UAL to mandate vaccination or I’m jacking your rates up an equal amount minimum. I can’t trust your 90%. You might have 90% liar’s. That’s how that works.
5.5% of the infected are hospitalized in your area. That means nothing without context. You could be talking about a 50 mile radius that encompasses 10 people or 200,000 people.
So you'd advocate 100% vaccination to stop people from going to the hospital? What about colds, pneumonia, bronchitis? Shouldn't we stop those folks from having to go to hospital as well while we're at it?
So what do the actuaries at the insurance companies say to 100% "vaccination" with a zero data set on the long term affects of the multiple vaccines on the market?
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk