Originally Posted by
Thedude86
I know that. You know that. Any doctor willing to do research knows that. The FDA probably knows that too, but they’re not making it public information that there’s a difference between horse and human Ivermectin. The FDA recently put out a meme on Twitter saying that Ivermectin is strictly for horses and cows and for people NOT to use it. They didn’t make ANY mention of human use despite being used over 2.8 billion times in Africa alone. Why is that?
The majority if not 100% of actual use and practice has shown Ivermectin to be extremely effective. I’ll ask you as well… would you tell all those people in India to stop using Ivermectin because your big pharma studies don’t support the data? Even though the people of India has said it’s saved thousands if not millions of lives? You would advise them to stop taking Ivermectin? Seriously?
A quick search shows the FDA's POV:
"Some of the side-effects that may be associated with ivermectin include skin rash, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, stomach pain, facial or limb swelling, neurologic adverse events (dizziness, seizures, confusion), sudden drop in blood pressure, severe skin rash potentially requiring hospitalization and liver injury (hepatitis). Laboratory test abnormalities include decrease in white cell count and elevated liver tests. Any use of ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 should be avoided as its benefits and safety for these purposes have not been established. Data from clinical trials are necessary for us to determine whether ivermectin is safe and effective in treating or preventing COVID-19."
Doesn't this answer your question? What does this have to do with our vaccine mandate?